Subject: Fw: eBibleQuestions16 - does the Old Testament envision peace? |
From |
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:18:32 -0400 (GMT-04:00) |
To: don@donredding.com |
-----Forwarded Message-----
From: "Howell, James"
Sent: Jun 21, 2005 10:29 AM
To: eBibleQuestions
Subject:
eBibleQuestions16 - does the Old Testament envision peace?
eBibleQuestions16 – Does the Old
Testament Envision Peace?
Although superficially the Old Testament
seems to be so much mayhem, when we probe deeply we discover an extraordinary
vision of peace. “They shall beat their
swords into plowshares, their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift
up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more” (Isaiah
2:4). “The wolf shall dwell with the
lamb; a little child shall lead them. They shall not hurt or destroy... for the earth shall be full of the knowledge
of the Lord” (Isaiah
11:6-9).
For Israel, peace (shalom) is
not merely the absence of war, but a life of justice, righteousness, prayerful
devotion to God’s will. Promises of
peace are pegged to appeals for justice.
When there is no justice, there is no peace, or peace is bogus (Jeremiah
6:13-14). Shalom
is the
full participation of all people in God’s blessings; the rich do not hoard;
holiness is everything; freedom isn’t doing my will, but
God’s.
In his latest book, The
Sins of Scripture, John
Shelby Spong “exposes the Bible’s texts of hate to reveal the God of love.” But the Bible has already done this for
him. Most of the Bible’s warfare was not
of God. “Repay no one evil for evil;
vengeance is mine, not yours,” says the Lord (Deuteronomy
32:35; Romans
12:17). The people pleaded with
Samuel for a king “to fight our
battles”
(1
Samuel 8) – but their desired battles were not of God. David was a famous warrior, but was denied
the privilege of building the temple, so bloodstained were his hands (1
Chronicles 22:6-9). How many kings
hurled armies into battle in God’s name, but God was not on their side? Jehoshaphat asked 400 pious prophets if he
should go to war, and these yes-men resoundingly blessed his plan. But one, Micaiah, bucked their fervor and
opposed the war. Whining that Micaiah
was unpatriotic, the king threw him in jail, listened to the 400 – and was
killed alongside brave soldiers who had no business in that battle (1
Kings 22). The clergy and the
prophets not only had the right to pass judgment on political
power-brokers. They were expected to,
and failure to do so was censured by God.
The faithful urged imperialistic-minded kings not to go to war – even
when it seemed the only logical course of action.
Throughout history, the Bible’s stories have
been manipulated to justify military actions.
In 1099, Crusaders did as Joshua
did: they prayed, marched around
Jerusalem seven times, blew trumpets – but the walls did not come a-tumblin’
down. So they took God’s will into their
own hands, breached the fortifications, slaughtering tens of thousands – but it
was not of God. Medieval theologians
devised a “just war theory,”
trying to understand life in a harsh world, and the necessity for self-defense,
yet in the light of Jesus’ words that “those who live by the sword die by the
sword” (Matthew
26:52), and “Love your enemies, turn the other cheek” (Matthew
5) – but this will require another email on another
day.
James
The
complete email series on Bible Questions can be found if you click here.
Coming
up:
eBibleQuestions17
– What can archaeology tell us? and not tell us?
eBibleQuestions18
– What was daily life like in Bible times?
eBibleQuestions19
– What was the role of women in Bible times?
eBibleQuestions20 – Why all the bloody
sacrifices in the Old Testament?